Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Blog #3: Competitive Landscape of the Restaurant Industry

        The competitive landscape of the restaurant industry is broken into different segments which are based on the type of dining the restaurant involved in as well as price. Fine dining is the most expensive of the landscapes, and the meals are valued at $35 dollars and up. Restaurants that are categorized in this landscape include Ruth Chris Steak House and The Capital Grille (TM Capital. page 5, 2010). The next landscape is the upscale-casual restaurants. In order to be part of this landscape, the value of the dining will be around $18 to $35. This part of the industry includes restaurants such as Cheesecake Factory, Outback Steak House, and Darden Restaurants (TM Capital, page 5, 2010). Casual dining is another landscape involved in this industry. In order to be part of this landscape, the value of the meal is priced between $12 to $18 and restaurants classified as casual dining include Panera Bread and Red Robin (TM Capital, page 5, 2010). Another landscape for the restaurant industry is family dining. This landscape is usually priced from $8 to $12. Some of the prominent restaurants involved in with this landscape are Denny’s and Cracker Barrel (TM Capital, page 5, 2010). The final landscape is the quick service restaurants. There is no specific pricing for the value of the meal, but this is usually cheap fast food. This will include restaurants such as McDonalds and Domino’s Pizza.
My company, Starbucks, fits into the landscape of quick service restaurants. Their main competitors include Dunkin Donuts and McDonalds. Because Starbucks is primarily involved with premium coffee they do not have to compete with other fast casual restaurants such as Chipotle. McDonalds, however, has become the biggest threat to Starbucks’s sales. Starbucks has to compete with McDonalds’ McCafe which is a low cost alternative. (Cardenal October 23 2012). Starbucks still controls 60% of the value share in specialist coffee shops showing that they still dominate this area of the quick service restaurant landscape.

Cited Sources:
TM Capital (February 2011). Restaurant Industry Spotlight/ Retrieved from http://www.tmcapital.com/assets/11_2.pdf
Andres Cardenal (October 23, 2012). This Powerful Brand Looks Temptingly Cheap. Retrieved from http://beta.fool.com/acardenal/2012/10/23/powerful-brand-looks-temptingly-cheap/15086/
Amy Schein (Not Available). Starbucks Corporation. Retrieved from http://subscriber.hoovers.com/H/company360/competitiveLandscape.html?companyId=15745000000000

3 comments:

  1. I really like the information about real barriers between the different types of restaurants. Sometimes I feel like it can be confusing when trying to compare and contrast different kinds of restaurants. How much do you think that restaurants in different price/type of dining segments still compete with each other?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I find it to be extremely interesting that Starbucks is considered to be a quick service restaurant because they place such emphasis on high quality products and quick service restaurants have been known to be lacking in this area. I suppose that this is just a main characteristic that sets Starbucks apart from its competitors. It could even be looked at as a major step that changes people's opinion of the product quality in that landscape.

    ReplyDelete
  3. We have a large range of different types of Artificial grass to meet your needs and budget. We have lush green grass, Tri colour (looks very real) and various colours. All our grass is uv resistant, flame retardant, waterproof, colourfast, pet and child friendly and all has a full manufacturers guarantee.

    Please take a look at our shop and give us a call if you require and further advice.

    Trade Artificial Grass , Cheap Artificial Grass , Artificial Grass Supliers , Artificial Grass Coventry , Artificial Grass Birmingham , Artificial Grass Nuneaton , Artificial Grass Warwick , Wholesale Artificial Grass

    ReplyDelete